Nonlinear finite element analyses confront users with many choices. An understanding of the fundamental concepts of
nonlinear finite element analysis is necessary if you do not want to use the finite element program as a black box.
The purpose of this manual is to describe the numerical methods included in Radioss.
Kinematic constraints are boundary conditions that are placed on nodal velocities. They are mutually exclusive for each degree
of freedom (DOF), and there can only be one constraint per DOF.
The stability of solution concerns the evolution of a process subjected to small perturbations. A process is considered
to be stable if small perturbations of initial data result in small changes in the solution. The theory of stability
can be applied to a variety of computational problems.
A large variety of materials is used in the structural components and must be modeled in stress analysis problems.
For any kind of these materials a range of constitutive laws is available to describe by a mathematical approach the
behavior of the material.
Explicit scheme is generally used for time integration in Radioss, in which velocities and displacements are obtained by direct integration of nodal accelerations.
The performance criterion in the computation was always an essential point in the architectural conception of Radioss. At first, the program has been largely optimized for the vectored super-calculators like CRAY. Then, a first parallel
version SMP made possible the exploration of shared memory on processors.
Solid-shell elements form a class of finite element models intermediate between thin shell and
conventional solid elements. From geometrical point of view, they are represented by
solid meshes with two nodes through the thickness and generally without rotational
degree-of-freedom. On the other hand, they account for shell-like behavior in the
thickness direction. They are useful for modeling shell-like portions of a 3D
structure without the need to connect solid element nodes to shell nodes (図 1).
The derivation of solid-shell elements is more complicated than that of standard solid elements since they are prone to the following problems:
Shear and membrane locking with the hybrid strain formulation 12, the hybrid stress 3, and the Assumed and Enhanced
Natural Strain formulations. 4567
Trapezoidal locking caused by deviation of mid-plane from rectangular shape 8.
Thickness locking due to Poisson's ratio coupling of the in-plane and transverse normal
stresses. 1246
Solid shell elements in Radioss are the solid elements with a
treatment of the normal stresses in the thickness direction. This treatment consists
of ensuring constant normal stresses in the thickness by a penalty method. Advantage
of this approach with respect to the plane-stress treatment is that it can simulate
the normal deformability and exhibits no discernible locking problems. The
disadvantage is its possible small time step since it is computed as solid element
and the characteristic length is determined often using the thickness.
The solid-shell elements of Radioss are:
HA8: 8-node linear solid and solid-shell with or without reduced integration
scheme,
HSEPH: 8-node linear thick shell with reduced integration scheme and
physical stabilization of hourglass modes,
PA6: Linear pentahedral element for thick shells,
SHELL16: 16-node quadratic thick shell.
The thick shell elements HA8 and HSEPH are respectively the solid elements HA8 and HEPH in which
the hypothesis of constant normal stress through the thickness is applied by penalty
method. The theoretical features of these elements are explained in Solid Hexahedron Elements. The thick shell element
SHELL16 is described hereby.
Thick Shell Elements
SHELL16
The element can be used to model thick-walled structures situated
between 3D solids and thin shells. The element is presented in 図 2. It has 16 nodes with three translational
DOFs per each node. The element is quadratic in plane and linear through the
thickness. The numerical integration through the thickness is carried out by
Gauss-Lobatto schemes rise up to 9 integrations to enhance the quality of
elasto-plastic behavior. The in-plane integration may be done by a reduced 2x2
scheme or a fully integrated 3x3 points (図 3). A reduced integration method is applied to
the normal stress in order to avoid locking problems.
The distribution of mass is not homogenous over the nodes. The internal
nodes receive three times more mass than the corner nodes as shown in 図 4.
1Ausserer M.F. and Lee S.W., 「An eighteen node solid element for thin shell analysis」,Int.Journal Num.Methods in Engineering, Vol. 26, pp. 1345, 1364, 1988.
2Park H.C., Cho C. and Lee S.W., 「An efficient assumed strain element model with six dof per node for geometrically nonlinear shells」, Int. Journal Num.Methods in Engineering, Vol. 38, pp. 4101-4122, 1995.
3Sze K.Y. and Ghali A., 「A hexahedral element for plates, shells and beam by selective scaling」, Int. Journal Num.Methods in Engineering, Vol. 36, pp. 1519-1540, 1993.
4Betch P. and Stein E., 「An assumed strain approach avoiding artificial thickness straining for a nonlinear 4-node shell element」, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 11, pp. 899-909, 1997.
5Bischoff M. and Ramm E., 「Shear deformable shell elements for large strains and rotations」, Int. Journal Num.Methods in Engineering, Vol. 40, pp. 445-452, 1997.
6Hauptmann R. and Schweizerhof K., 「A systematic development of solid-shell element formulations for linear and nonlinear analysis employing only displacement degrees of freedom」, Int. Journal Num.Methods in Engineering, Vol. 42, pp. 49-69, 1988.
7Simo J.C. and Rifai M.S., 「A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes」, Int. Journal Num.Methods in Engineering, Vol. 9, pp. 1595-1638, 1990.
8Donea J., 「An Arbitary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions」, Computer methods in applied mechanics, 1982.